The Broadband Health Imperative 888011000110888 For almost a decade and a half, as an Associate Director of the Johns Hopkins Urban Health Institute, it has been my responsibility to work on one of the most challenging troubles in healthcare − improving populace health. My work has taken me personally from the so-called “ivory tower” of Johns Hopkins to the homes, alleys and communities of inner city East Baltimore. By means of my experiences, I’ve realized that despite the U. S. having an amazing health care system, it was doing little to reduce the endless flow of patients coming into emergency rooms and hospitals for care. We could treat a lot of physical and psychological ailments, yet we were often powerless to provide the support patients and families required to manage their chronic diseases or truly live “well”. We were powerless not because we could not see what was needed neither because we did not care; instead, as the infographic below suggests, there were too many people that needed treatment instead of enough providers to meet their needs. We were taught as medical college students to focus on tests, diagnostics, therapies plus treatments. I, like many others, believed that if we could just give the best care to every patient, we would ultimately fix our nation’s health care problems. But it isn’t that simple. Customers rely on many resources for their health – doctors, social services, health professionals, pharmacies, caregivers and others. When these types of “providers” remain unconnected, it is a prescription for frustration, burnout, high expenses and suboptimal outcomes. I am often asked, “Why would certainly a Hopkins doctor come to the FCC? ” My answer is easy. It’s because I can’t observe how we are going to improve our nation’s health without aggressively pursuing the potential that broadband and broadband-enabled health systems have to offer. Many of these broadband benefits are actually on the horizon. So what better place to end up being than the FCC! Lately, U. S. News and Planet Report looked at how eICUs eliminate distancefrom the equation; Forbes tackled the benefits of broadband-enabled telemedicine especially for smaller businesses; and an October 2014 content in Population Health concluded that connect2health@fcc. gov) will continue to work with other policymakers, businesses, organizations, healthcare providers, communications companies and consumers that are interested in this populace health vision. We want to hear through individuals—young and old—who are using broadband-based technologies to successfully address health concerns. We want to better understand adoption barriers to broadband-enabled health technologies, through rich and poor alike, and in rural and urban areas. And, we all plan to do our part to spot policy and regulatory challenges that inhibit innovation, investment and entrepreneurship in digital health. Our goal is to be a catalyst for making this particular new broadband-enabled health and care ecosystem a reality.

Author:  

Dr . Chris Gibbons

FCC Distinguished Scholar in Residence, Connect2HealthFCC Task Force

For almost a decade and a half, as an Associate Director of the Johns Hopkins Urban Health Institute, it has been my responsibility to work on one of the most challenging troubles in healthcare − improving populace health.   My work has brought me from the so-called “ off white tower” of Johns Hopkins towards the homes, alleys and communities of inner city East Baltimore.  

Through my experiences, I’ ve realized that despite the Oughout. S. having an amazing healthcare system, it was doing little to reduce the endless flow of patients entering emergency rooms and hospitals meant for care. We could treat many actual physical and psychological ailments, but we were often powerless to provide the assistance patients and families needed to deal with their chronic diseases or truly live “ well”.

We were powerless not because we could not see what was needed neither because we did not care; instead, as the infographic below suggests, there were too many people that needed treatment instead of enough providers to meet their needs.   We were taught as healthcare students to focus on tests, diagnostics, therapies and treatments.   I, like many others, believed that if we could just give the best care to every patient, we might ultimately fix our nation’ ersus health care problems.   But it isn’ t that simple.

Customers rely on many resources for their health – doctors, social services, health professionals, pharmacies, caregivers and others.   Whenever these “ providers” remain unconnected, it is a prescription for frustration, burnout, high costs and suboptimal results.  

reading more


No Responses to “The Broadband Health Imperative 888011000110888 For almost a decade and a half, as an Associate Director of the Johns Hopkins Urban Health Institute, it has been my responsibility to work on one of the most challenging troubles in healthcare − improving populace health. My work has taken me personally from the so-called “ivory tower” of Johns Hopkins to the homes, alleys and communities of inner city East Baltimore. By means of my experiences, I’ve realized that despite the U. S. having an amazing health care system, it was doing little to reduce the endless flow of patients coming into emergency rooms and hospitals for care. We could treat a lot of physical and psychological ailments, yet we were often powerless to provide the support patients and families required to manage their chronic diseases or truly live “well”. We were powerless not because we could not see what was needed neither because we did not care; instead, as the infographic below suggests, there were too many people that needed treatment instead of enough providers to meet their needs. We were taught as medical college students to focus on tests, diagnostics, therapies plus treatments. I, like many others, believed that if we could just give the best care to every patient, we would ultimately fix our nation’s health care problems. But it isn’t that simple. Customers rely on many resources for their health – doctors, social services, health professionals, pharmacies, caregivers and others. When these types of “providers” remain unconnected, it is a prescription for frustration, burnout, high expenses and suboptimal outcomes. I am often asked, “Why would certainly a Hopkins doctor come to the FCC? ” My answer is easy. It’s because I can’t observe how we are going to improve our nation’s health without aggressively pursuing the potential that broadband and broadband-enabled health systems have to offer. Many of these broadband benefits are actually on the horizon. So what better place to end up being than the FCC! Lately, U. S. News and Planet Report looked at how eICUs eliminate distancefrom the equation; Forbes tackled the benefits of broadband-enabled telemedicine especially for smaller businesses; and an October 2014 content in Population Health concluded that connect2health@fcc. gov) will continue to work with other policymakers, businesses, organizations, healthcare providers, communications companies and consumers that are interested in this populace health vision. We want to hear through individuals—young and old—who are using broadband-based technologies to successfully address health concerns. We want to better understand adoption barriers to broadband-enabled health technologies, through rich and poor alike, and in rural and urban areas. And, we all plan to do our part to spot policy and regulatory challenges that inhibit innovation, investment and entrepreneurship in digital health. Our goal is to be a catalyst for making this particular new broadband-enabled health and care ecosystem a reality.”




By submitting a comment here you grant a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.